By Sir Andrew Green
Chairman of Migration Watch UK
Conservativehome, 7 January, 2012
The immigration industry is in a corner. The government are
proceeding with wide-ranging reform of the immigration system supported
by very strong public opinion. Special interest groups are fighting
rear guard actions, often based on misrepresentation of government
policy. Otherwise, there is nobody arguing against the need to reduce
net immigration. Even Labour’s spokesman on immigration, Chris Bryant,
was obliged to admit in Parliament that “yes of course we think that
immigration has been too high and that it should be lower”.
Perhaps that is why some on the left are seeking to suggest that public opinion is not what it seems to be. The IPPR, the Migrants' Rights Network and others, have latched onto a paper produced by the Migration Observatory entitled “Thinking behind the numbers – understanding public opinion on immigration in Britain”. And guess what... the BBC News website lapped it up too.
This paper reported the results of an opinion poll which sought the
public’s views on various categories of migrant and whether they should
be reduced (or increased).
They found, for example, that only about one third of the public
wanted the number of students reduced – no doubt for the obvious reason
that most of them go home after their courses. The picture on workers
was more mixed; 59% wanted restaurant staff cut back but only 31% wanted
the number of highly skilled workers reduced.
No surprises there - but the paper went on to suggest that, if the
government did not take these preferences into account, they would risk
reducing immigration in a way that a majority of the public did not
support. This was the message that the immigration lobby and the BBC
latched onto with such enthusiasm. Unfortunately for them, the survey
itself bore no relation to the government’s actual policies. The
general approach was not described, nor were respondents asked about any
of the policy measures actually proposed. On the contrary, they were
asked about a range of matters unrelated to present policies. For
example, they were asked whether the number of low skilled workers
admitted to Britain should be reduced or not. In fact, as the report
recognised elsewhere, the only low skilled migrants admitted to Britain
are from the EU over which the government has no control. Respondents
were then asked whether various categories of students should be
increased, reduced or kept the same. In fact, of course, the government
policy is not to increase or reduce the number of students; it is to
eliminate bogus students – a quite different matter. The paper did
admit, however, that “there is no question that a large majority of the
public supports overall reductions to immigration levels”. They found
that 69% supported this but even this figure was lower than usual
because the survey included Scotland and 15-17 year olds where
opposition to immigration is lower.
The only valid conclusion from this paper is that the public has a
shaky knowledge of the details of immigration policy – a characteristic
that appears to be shared by the authors and purveyors of the report.
Those who had any part in canvassing, for whatever political party,
during the last election will be in no doubt of the strength of public
opinion on the subject. If they are to retain the confidence of the
public, the government would be well advised to stay firmly on the case.
See Briefing Paper No 10.26 for the memorandum on which this was based.
© Copyright of Sir Andrew Green,,,,,,,,
I found this on the exellent web site migration watch uk have a look ,,,,,,, Migration Watch UK - What do the public really think about immigration?
No comments:
Post a Comment